Swantje Bargmann Dissertation

Six young researchers have been selected for the Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Prize 2011, the most important award for early career researchers in Germany.

The selection committee appointed by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research chose from a total of 145 nominated candidates from all research areas – more than ever in the history of the award. Remarkable is the young age of the prize winners. Four of them are under or have just turned 30 and have thus acquired an outstanding qualification and a substantial independent research profile, the most important criteria for the prize.

The Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Prize, endowed with 16,000 EUR and funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, will be awarded on 9 May at 2 pm at the Magnus-Haus in Berlin, Germany.

The 2011 prize goes to:

  • Dr. Swantje Bargmann (30, pictured), engineering sciences, junior professor at Technical University of Dortmund, is being awarded as a most versatile early career researcher in engineering sciences who is conducting research in three challenging fields. In particular her work on the modelling of crystal plasticity is considered highly innovative and is of great importance for developing new materials. Bargmann has also set new trends by developing a method for the anisotropic modelling of polar ice. In continuation of her thesis, she conducts research into thermoelasticity. Characteristic of Bargmann's research is her interdisciplinary cooperation with engineers, mathematicians, physicists and materials scientists and her international orientation, which is reflected by numerous research visits and joint projects with peers in Japan, South Korea, South Africa, Sweden and the United States.
  • Dr. Markus Friedrich (36), modern history, research assistant at University of Frankfurt/Main, masterfully combines intellectual history with analyses of social history.
  • Dr. Christian Hackenberger (34, pictured), chemistry, Free University of Berlin, is one of the most promising German early career researchers in the field of bioorganic chemistry. In particular with his work on chemical methods of development, he quickly established an international reputation. The so-called "Staudinger Phospihtligation" method he developed facilitates the systematic linking of proteins with organic substances, which is one of the biggest problems in biological chemistry. Hackenberger's research is of great importance in many areas of the life sciences and has a high application potential, since proteins often also need to be modified for medical applications. For his publications in leading international journals, the chemist has already won several awards. Currently, Hackenberger heads his own working group at the Free University of Berlin as part of the DFG’s Emmy Noether Programme.
  • Dr. Thorsten Holz (29), computer science, junior professor at Ruhr University of Bochum, has gained international renown in the field of IT security and data protection, especially for his work on virtual security threats and the development of defence mechanisms.
  • Dr. Moritz Kerz (27), mathematics, University of Duisburg-Essen, was able to achieve outstanding results and prove important hypotheses at an early age in the field of algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry.
  • Dr. Henrike Manuwald (30), literature, junior professor at University of Freiburg, is already an internationally recognised and leading mediator between literature and art history in medieval studies.

Article Views: 2764

  • 1.

    Abraham R, Marsden JE, Ratiu T (1998) Manifolds, tensor analysis, and applications, applied mathematical sciences, vol 75. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Acharya A, Bassani JL (2000) Lattice incompatibility and a gradient theory of crystal plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 48: 1565–1595MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Acharya A, Bassani JL, Beaudoin A (2003) Geometrically necessary dislocations, hardening, and a simple gradient theory of crystal plasticity. Script Mater 48: 167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Anand L, Gurtin ME, Lele SP, Gething C (2005) A one-dimensional theory of strain-gradient plasticity: Formulation, analysis, numerical results. J Mech Phys Solids 53: 1789–1826MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Bardella L (2006) A deformation theory of strain gradient crystal plasticity that accounts for geometrically necessary dislocations. J Mech Phys Solids 54: 128–160MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Bargmann S, Svendsen B (2011) Rate variational continuum thermodynamic modeling and simulation of GND-based latent hardening in polycrystals. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng (accepted for publication)Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Asaro RJ (1983) Micromechanics of crystals and polycrystals. Adv Appl Mech 23: 1–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Ashby MF (1970) The deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials. Phil Mag 21: 399–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Bassani JL, Wu TY (1991) Latent hardening in single crystals. 2. Analytical characterization and predictions. Proc R Soc Lond A 435: 21–41MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Bauschinger J (1881) . Zivilingenieur 27: 289–348Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Brezzi F, Fortin M (1991) Mixed and hybrid finite element methods. Springer, New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Carstensen C, Hackl K, Mielke A (2003) Nonconvex potentials and microstructures in finite-strain plasticity. Proc R Soc Lond A 458: 299–317MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

  • 13.

    Cermelli P, Gurtin ME (2001) On the characterization of the geometrically necessary dislocations in finite plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 49: 1539–1568MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Coleman B, Noll W (1963) The thermodynamics of elastic materials with heat conduction and viscosity. Arch Rat Mech Anal 13: 167–178MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 15.

    Coleman B, Gurtin M (1967) Thermodynamics with internal state variables. J Chem Phys 47: 597–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Dai H, Parks DM (1997) Geometrically-necessary dislocation density and scale-dependent crystal plasticity. In: Khan AS (ed) Proceedings of plasticity ’97, pp 17–18Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Edelen DGB (1973) On the existence of symmetry relations and dissipation potential. Arch Rat Mech Anal 51: 218–227MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 18.

    Ekh M, Grymer M, Runesson K, Svedberg T (2007) Gradient crystal plasticity as part of the computational modeling of polycrystals. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72: 197–220MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 19.

    Ekh M, Bargmann S, Grymer M (2011) Influence of grain boundary conditions on modeling of size-dependence in polycrystals. Acta Mech 218(1–2): 103–113. doi:10.1007/s00707-010-0403-9MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 20.

    Evers LP, Brekelmanns WAM, Geers MGD (2004) Scale dependent crystal plasticity framework with dislocation density and grain boundary effects. Int J Solids Struct 41: 5209–5230MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 21.

    Fleck NA, Muller GM, Ashby MF, Hutchinson JW (1994) Strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment. Acta Metal Mater 42: 475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 22.

    Franciosi P, Berveiller M, Zaoui A (1980) Latent hardening in copper and aluminium single crystals. Acta Metall 28: 273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 23.

    Franciosi P, Zaoui A (1983) Glide mechanisms in bcc crystals: an investigation of the case of α-iron through multislip and latent hardening tests. Acta Metall 31: 1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 24.

    Gurtin ME (2000) On the plasticity of single crystals: free energy. microforces, plastic-strain gradients. J Mech Phys Solids 48: 989–1036MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Gurtin ME (2002) A theory of viscoplasticity that accounts for geometrically necessary dislocations. J Mech Phys Solids 50: 5–32MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 26.

    Hall EO (1951) The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results. Proc Phys Soc Lond B 64: 747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Kocks UF (1964) Latent hardening and secondary slip in aluminum and silver. Trans Metall Soc AIME 230: 1160Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Kocks UF (1970) The relation between polycrystal deformation and single crystal deformation. Metall Trans 1: 1121–1144Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Kondo K (1953) On the geometrical and physical foundations of the theory of yielding. In: Proceedings of the second Japan national congress for applied mechanics. Science Council of Japan, Tokyo, pp 41–47Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Kröner E (1960) Allgemeine Kontinuumstheorie der Versetzungen und Eigenspannungen. Arch Rat Mech Anal 4: 273–334MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    Lee EH (1969) Elastic-plastic deformation at finite strains. J Appl Mech 36: 1–6MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Levkovitch V, Svendsen B (2006) On the large-deformation- and continuum-based formulation of models for extended crystal plasticity. Int J Solids Struct 43: 7246–7267MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 33.

    Mandel J (1971) Plasticité classique et viscoplasticité, CISM Courses and Lectures, vol 97. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

  • 34.

    Menzel A, Steinmann P (2000) On the continuum formulation of higher gradient plasticity for single and polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids 48: 1777–1796MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 35.

    Miehe C (2002) Strain-driven homogenization of inelastic microstructures and composites based on an incremental variational formulation. Int J Num Methods Eng 55: 1285–1322MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 36.

    Mura T (1987) Micromechanics of defects in solids. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 37.

    Needleman A, Sevillano JG (2003) Preface to the viewpoint set on: geometrically necessary dislocations and size dependent plasticity. Script Mater 48: 109–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 38.

    Niordson CF, Legarth BN (2010) Strain gradient effects on cyclic plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 58(4): 542–557MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 39.

    Nye JF (1953) Some geometric relations in dislocated crystals. Acta Metall 1: 153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 40.

    Ortiz M, Repetto EA (1999) Non-convex energy minimization and dislocation structures in ductile single crystals. J Mech Phys Solids 47: 397–462MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 41.

    Ortiz M, Stainier L (1999) The variational formulation of viscoplastic constitutive updates. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 171: 419–444MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 42.

    Petch NJ (1953) The cleavage strength of polycrystals I. J Iron Steel Inst 174: 25–28Google Scholar

  • 43.

    Piercy GR, Cahn RW, Cottrell AH (1955) A study of primary and conjugate slip in crystals of alpha-brass. Acta Metall. 3: 333–338Google Scholar

  • 44.

    Rauch EF, Gracio JJ, Barlat F, Lopes AB, Ferreira Duarte J (2002) Hardening behavior and structural evolution upon strain reversal of aluminium alloys. Script Mater 46(12): 881–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 45.

    Rice J (1971) Inelastic constitutive relations for solids: an internal-variable theory and its application to metal plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 19: 433–455MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 46.

    Saimoto S (1963) Low temperature tensile deformation of copper single crystals oriented for multiple slip. PhD thesis, MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

  • 47.

    Shizawa K, Zbib HM (1999) A thermodynamical theory of gradient elastoplasticity with dislocation density tensor. I. Fundamentals. Int J Plast 15: 899–938MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 48.

    Šilhavý M (1997) The mechanics and thermodynamics of continuous media. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar

  • 49.

    Steinmann P (1996) Views on multiplicative elastoplasticity and the continuum theory on dislocations. Int J Eng Sci 34: 1717–1735MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 50.

    Stelmashenko NA, Walls MG, Brown LM, Milman YV (1993) Microindentations on W and Mo oriented single crystals: an STM study. Acta Metall Mater 41: 2855–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 51.

    Stölken JS, Evans AG (1998) A microbend test method for measuring the plasticity length scale. Acta Mater 46: 5109–5115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 52.

    Svendsen B (2002) Continuum thermodynamic models for crystal plasticity including the effects of geometrically-necessary dislocations. J Mech Phys Solids 50: 1297–1329MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 53.

    Svendsen B, Bargmann S (2010) On the continuum thermodynamic rate variational formulation of models for extended crystal plasticity at large deformation. J Mech Phys Solids 58: 1253–1271MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 54.

    Taylor GI, Elam CF (1925) The plastic extension and fracture of aluminium crystals. Proc R Soc Lond A 108(745): 28–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 55.

    Thompson AW, Baskes MI, Flanagan WF (1973) The dependence of polycrystal work hardening on grain size. Acta Metall 21: 1017–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 56.

    Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM, Florando JN, Nix WD (2004) Sample dimensions influence strength and crystal plasticity. Science 305: 986–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 57.

    Yalcinkaya T, Brekelmans WAM, Geers MGD (2011) Deformation patterning driven by rate dependent non-convex strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 59(1): 1–17MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 58.

    Zimmer WH, Hecker SS, Rohr DL, Murr LE (1983) Large strain plastic deformation of commercially pure nickel. Metal Sci 17: 198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 0 thoughts on “Swantje Bargmann Dissertation”


    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *